I now want to ressurect it and use it as a middi-keyboards trigger for my sound modules. I STILL HAVE my S-50, which I bought in 1987 & kept in a Joe Cellini (Ft. HELLO S-50 GROUP, I just found this thread minutes ago & want to get some questions up here as i am short of time so please excuse my mispellings. for an hour and sell on for a higher price -) ) my friend uses his Emu II more like a synth anyhow.īut don't let me disway you from buying it. to some degree I could understand why someone would consider an Emu II (in fact a friend of mine just got one) just to use those libraries esp as the Emu II had a proper VCF I think. (grrr)Īlso I don't think the ROland sample library is a classic library in the same way the Emu-II and Fairlight libraries were. also had the mouse and the RC100 control. in fact I had the SYS 503 sequencing software on my S330 and it was incredible for the time. I mean the S50 was the worst of the bunch really as it didn't even have proper filters.īut we're all different, I personally think it'll collect dust. esp samplers (completely understand why people go crazy for Arps and Moogs. I think modern ways of working are much better than the kind of misty eyed romanticism many seem to have over 80s stuff. I mean yep it can be cool to hear some crunchiness in a sample but if you need to do that put a pristine 16 bit snare through the Reason Scream module. Well, I've never really bought this argument when it comes to samplers. I'm not saying that tuning your OS will fix your problems, but it might be worth some experimentation and there are a ton of websites that offer tips on tuning Windows for real time audio processing.But neither the Reason or Kontakt or other software have that sound. So I decided to dig in and tune Windows to function more efficiently at processing real time audio.Īfter tuning Windows, it took a couple of days of research and lots of experimentation, I was seeing DSP usage numbers on par with Reaper. This puzzled me and I exchanged a few emails with Harrison support, where they gave a few ideas to play with and none of them helped. Yet, I was seeing very poor performance on Mixbus and my other daw (Reaper) was running fine. My most recent system is a 12 core Xeon (3.0 Ghz) with 48 Gbytes of ram and is a beast of a machine. Mixbus doesn't play well out of the box on certain Windows setups and I was one of those who was seeing poor performance numbers, just like you are now witnessing. I started out using an internal audio chip set and had mediocre performance and soon switched to a external firewire interface with quality drivers and noticed a significant improvement in latency numbers over the internal audio. Since I don't know the parameters you used in your comparison, I can't comment on your setup. Please, can you tell us, which of your most quality interface you mean and whats the performance gain if you use it with Mixbus? I have tested now with my SD50, with Roland ASIO driver and the performance is worse than with internal soundcard and ASIO4ALL. Most quality interfaces use custom drivers that are tuned to work with the hardware as well as the protocol. He is using ASIO4ALL which is a generic program made to work on multiple interfaces/audio chip sets and adds additional latency. (12-07-2017, 02:21 AM)Hermu Wrote: (12-06-2017, 06:37 PM)Jay Gilb Wrote: (12-06-2017, 08:37 AM)Chregg Wrote: You'll defo get better performance with a decent interface, its not just about sound qualityĪbsolutely.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |